Dynamic Rippling, Middle-Out Reasoning and Lemma Discovery
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a succinct account of dynamic rippling, a technique used to guide the automation of inductive proofs. This simplifies termination proofs for rippling and hence facilitates extending the technique in ways that preserve termination. We illustrate this by extending rippling with a terminating version of middle-out reasoning for lemma speculation. This supports automatic speculation of schematic lemmas which are incrementally instantiated by unification as the rippling proof progresses. Middle-out reasoning and lemma speculation have been implemented in higher-order logic and evaluated on typical libraries of formalised mathematics. This reveals that, when applied, the technique often finds the needed lemmas to complete the proof, but it is not as frequently applicable as initially expected. In comparison, we show that theory formation methods, combined with simpler proof methods, offer an effective alternative.
منابع مشابه
Lemma Discovery and Middle-Out Reasoning for Automated Inductive Proofs
Lemma speculation has long been considered a promising technique to automate the discovery of missing lemmas for inductive proofs. This technique involves speculating a schematic lemma that becomes incrementally instantiated by unification as the proof continues. This synthesis process is known as middle-out reasoning. We have extended lemma speculation, and more generally middle-out reasoning,...
متن کاملIsaPlanner 2: A Proof Planner for Isabelle
We describe version 2 of IsaPlanner, a proof planner for the Isabelle proof assistant and present the central design decisions and their motivations. The major advances are the support for a declarative presentation of the proof plans, reasoning with meta-variables to support middle-out reasoning, new proof critics for lemma speculation and case analysis, the ability to mix search strategies, a...
متن کاملA Methodology for Equational Reasoning
1 This paper presents a methodology to guide equa-tional reasoning in a goal directed way. Suggested by rippling methods developed in the eld of inductive theorem proving we use attributes of terms and heuristics to determine bridge lemmas, i.e. lemmas which have to be used during the proof of the theorem. Once we have found such a bridge lemma we use the techniques of diierence uniication and ...
متن کاملUsing Rippling for Equational Reasoning
This paper presents techniques to guide equational reasoning in a goal directed way. Suggested by rippling methods developed in the eld of inductive theorem proving we use annotated terms to represent syntactical diierences of formulas. Based on these annotations and on hierarchies of function symbols we deene diierent abstractions of formulas which are used for planning of proofs. Rippling tec...
متن کاملEqualizing Terms by Diierence Reduction Techniques
In the eld of inductive theorem proving syntactical diierences between the induction hypothesis and induction conclusion are used in order to guide the proof BvHS91, Hut90, Hut]. This method of guiding induction proofs is called rippling / coloring terms and there is considerable evidence of its success on practical examples. For equality reasoning we use these annotated terms to represent synt...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010